The purpose of the public hearing is to receive formal testimony on the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project.
A plans display will be available for review in the school cafeteria beginning
at 5:00 p.m.
The public hearing and plans display are accessible to people with disabilities.
Persons who need special accommodations or would like additional information
should contact Mr. David Sherman, P.E., Project Manager, Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation, 1620 North Juniata Street, Hollidaysburg,
PA (814) 696-7170.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for public review at:
1. The municipality buildings for Somerset, Brothersvalley, Black and Summit Townships; and Berlin, Somerset and Garrett Boroughs.
2. The Meyersdale Public Library and the Somerset County Federated Library
3. PENNDOT District 9-0, 1620 North Juniata Street, Hollidaysburg, PA 16648, Mr. David Sherman (814) 696-7170
4. PENNDOT District 9-7 Maintenance Building, 1312 North Center Avenue, Somerset, PA 15501, Mr. David Sherman (814) 696-7170
5. Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc., 5000 Ritter Road, Suite 102, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, Ms. Kathy Krommes (717) 691-3355
Comments on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation will be accepted until November 30, 2004 and should be directed to: Thomas Prestash, P.E., Acting District Executive, Engineering District 9-0, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 1620 North Juniata St., Hollidaysburg, PA 16648, Attn: David Sherman.
PENNDOT District 9-0, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. and McCormick, Taylor & Associates, Inc. provided materials for an informational booth at the Somerset County Fair in Meyersdale, PA from August 16-23, 2003. Display materials consisted of alternatives mapping, photographs, handouts, and electronic slide shows describing the U.S. 219 Improvements projects that are underway from Meyersdale north to Somerset, and from Meyersdale south to I-68 in Maryland.
Each organization provided staff personnel to describe the various
displays, discuss project status, and answer questions. Many visitors
to the Fair stopped by to look at the displays and either ask questions
or offer opinions on the two projects. Most of the questions were
related to the time frame for completion of the studies and actual
construction of the roadway improvements. In addition, several comments
and suggestions were made regarding the location of alternatives
and potential impacts to properties. As has been the case throughout
the study process, the comments were overwhelmingly favorable for
the completion of these projects.
On
Thursday, October 24, 2002, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
(PENNDOT) held a Public Officials Meeting from 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. at the
Berlin-Brothersvalley School in Berlin, Pennsylvania. This meeting was
followed byan Open House for the public from approximately 5:00 to 8:00
p.m. These meetings were held to provide the public and public officials
with a project update, and to give them an opportunity to view and comment
on the four study alignments that have been developed during the Detailed
Study Phase of the project.
The Public Officials Meeting was opened by Mr. Ron Samuel, PENNDOT District 9-0 ADE-Design. Mr. Samuel provided an overview of both the North and South U.S. 219 Projects (Meyersdale to Somerset and Meyersdale to I-68). Mr. Dave Sherman, Project Manager, PENNDOT District 9-0, then provided more detail about the Meyersdale to Somerset project. According to Mr. Sherman, field work was completed over the summer. The design team then used this data to refine the preliminary study corridor alignments. Mr. Sherman then turned the meeting over to Mr. Joel Smith, Project Manager, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc., who provided a tour of the Open House and gave a brief introduction of the various display subject areas: Engineering, Environmental, Farmlands, Cultural Resources, Noise, Mining and GIS. Mr. Smith pointed out that the four study alignments were designed using the appropriate horizontal and vertical geometry and typical roadway section, so the cut and fill lines shown on the display maps now show the "footprint" of the roadway if it were constructed in the locations indicated, instead of the wider corridors that were shown during the preliminary study phase of the project. Mr. Sherman then provided information about the project schedule.
Following the presentation, the meeting was opened for questions and comments. One question asked was whether or not there is a preferred alternative. Mr. Sherman responded that the design team is leaning toward Alignment C-1. However, a preferred alignment can not be selected until all of the analysis has been completed. The public officials also asked for a comparison of the schedules for completion (construction) of the northern and southern projects. Mr. Sherman explained that the southern project started one year behind the northern project. The southern project is moving well, and there is a small chance that construction could begin on both projects at the same time, but budget constraints probably will not allow this to happen. Mr. Sherman pointed out that construction will probably not start until at least 2006.
An Open House was held following the Public Officials Meeting and was attended by approximately 105 people. Poster boards were displayed showing engineering, environmental, cultural, noise, and mining features. A 3-D simulation model of the project area was available, which allowed community residents to zoom in and view the proposed alignments from their property and to view their property from the alignment. This was done in conjunction with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping, displayed on an adjacent computer. This allowed property owners to see what specific physical and environmental features would be affected by the various alternatives in the vicinity of their property. Paper plots of project maps were also displayed, on which the public could indicate areas of special interest to them.
Many Open House attendees returned comment sheets and questionnaires to
the Project Team. Overall, many citizens were in favor of the project
and are eager to see it completed. Some residents stated that these improvements
are necessary in order for Somerset County to grow and progress. One resident
commented that they would not use the new route, but that it would probably
increase the possibility of new industry coming to the area. Another resident
believed that the road improvements will mean less traffic in front of
his home, which will make it less dangerous to enter and exit his property.
A
few meeting attendees indicated that Alignment D is the best alternative.
Four individuals indicated that if Alignment D is chosen as the preferred
alignment, an interchange where it crosses existing US 219, south of Berlin,
would be better than an interchange on Mud Pike. One individual also indicated
that the Mud Pike interchange would not be beneficial to the Berlin community.
They believed it would be too close to the existing U.S 219 interchange
near Somerset and would not be used. According to another resident of
Berlin, Alignments B, C, and C-1 would take business away from the community
and would have a negative impact on the Borough of Berlin.
Some residents indicated that Alignment C-1 is the best alternative. One individual stated they would like the shortest route to Meyersdale. He believed this would reduce costs related to snow removal and maintenance.
Several
individuals did not favor any of the alignments and would prefer to see
the project not happen. Concern was expressed that the road would disturb
the natural beauty of the environment and would adversely affect the wildlife
in the area. Some individuals expressed concern that the road would be
too close to their homes and would interfere with their lives. Increased
noise was also a concern for these individuals.
Environmental issues of concern included wetlands, endangered species, farmlands, water quality, and watershed damage. Special Interests that may be affected by the project include farm communities, sportsmen/hunters, and elderly people.
The project team will coordinate and attend public officials meetings and public meetings at key points throughout the project including:
Public Meeting to introduce the project (held in April 2001) Public Meeting to introduce the preliminary alternatives (held in December 2001) Public Meeting to present results of detailed studies (held in October 2002) Public Officials Meetings A Plans Display and Public Hearing after the Draft Environmental Impact Statement is published

![]()
The Project | Alternatives | In The News | Environment | Public Involvement | Kids Corner | Contacts | Home | Site Map
Copyright © 2002 by The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation